David

Linking Queerness With Fatness

Credit given where it’s due, this post came about in large part because of a thought process kick-started by a Twitter conversation I had with Fatheffalump a while back. She has a blog and you should probably already be reading it.

Ragen over at Dances With Fat made a post on her blog discussing the importance of Harvey Milk and his actions as an openly gay politician in shaping her approach to spreading the word about fat acceptance. The following quote stood out to me in particular:

You deserve to be treated well right now, whether or not you are trying to conform to the cultural stereotype of beauty.  You deserve respect, and you have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Right now. In the body in which you currently reside.

The reason that this post – and this quote in particular – really stands out to me, is two-fold. Firstly, while it might seem obvious to say this, I think that our (cultural) understanding of bodies plays an extremely important role in the denigration of fat; and secondly, I think that fatness and queerness actually have a lot more in common than we might first think.

There isn’t one particular way that we think about bodies. Gender, race, age, disability and class are just a few of the many factors that shape our expectations and assumptions about how bodies will look and/or function. However, a lot of the ideas that we have about bodies revolve around notions of bodily integrity and control (particularly around whether we have these things or not). The bodies of youthful, white, middle- to upper-class, heterosexual men are often held up, whether intentionally or not, as examples of the universal, unmarked ideal of humanity – that is, they’re the standard against which all other bodies are (seemingly inevitably) compared.

Against the standard of this type of body, female bodies are considered more permeable (they bleed, they are penetrated, they give birth) and more beholden to the whims of their biology (hormones, for example); the bodies of other racial groups are less civilised/more animalistic (black men are deemed more dangerous and aggressive), inferior (Asian men are assumed to have smaller penises), or exotic (black women are more sexualised, Asian women are smaller and more docile); aged bodies are assumed to be less capable of both fulfilling their roles and providing happiness; we focus on disability rather than ability; the poor are less healthy and able to look after themselves, so on and so forth. All of these are examples of the stereotypes that immediately position anyone who is not youthful, white, middle- to upper-class, heterosexual and male as an Other.

Enter the fat. As the stereotypes go, they are unable to control themselves and eat to excess; they destroy the integrity of their bodies by stretching them outward, creating unsightly lumps, bumps and ripples of flesh. They take up space and demand attention of their own.

Enter the queer. Again, going by the stereotypes, they’re unable to control themselves and go against the natural order of things; they destroy the integrity of their bodies by opening them up to new uses, making the should-be-impermeable into the actually-quite-permeable – and, in the case of the same-sex attracted male in particular, penetrable. They claim the space of their bodies as their own, put their bodies to their own uses and demand that the normative nature of heterosexuality be brought into question.

If there’s a sense of the grotesque coming through in these descriptions, it’s not because I feel that way. Rather, it’s because I think that both fat and queer bodies are seen as dangerous and frightening by those who seek to maintain the youthful, white, middle- to upper-class, heterosexual and male body (which I’ll henceforth refer to as heteronormative bodies) as the ideal.

Fat and queer bodies both challenge the spatial dominance and impermeability of heteronormative bodies, albeit in different ways.

Fat bodies can do this in a literal way, by taking up more space and offering a challenge to the control of space that those with heteronormative bodies are used to. A fat woman’s body in particular challenges the usual order of things, whereby men are more likely to spread themselves out and women are more likely to keep their limbs in tight to their bodies, taking up as little space as possible.

Queer bodies can offer several different types of challenges. For example, gay men point to the possibility of penetration of the male body and call into question the homosocial-verging-on-homosexual nature of many heterosexual bonding rituals; lesbians offer a rejection of the cultural importance given to male genitals; bisexual men and women have a particular kind of control over their choice in sexual partners that can trump the choices of heternormative males; and trans* individuals can stand as a challenge to the sex/gender dualism, whilst also leading some to question their sexuality (in situations where the nature of trans* identities isn’t properly understood or recognised).*

In all of these instances, the dominant position of heteronormative bodies is challenged and called into question. The bodies discussed in this post, in their unboundedness – their inability to be neatly contained or controlled within the bounds of a simple cultural narrative – are dangerous to the norm. This is why we – whether we’re fat, queer, or both – are put down by others.

It’s also why we should make an effort to take control of our own sense of self worth and happiness.

By being out and proud about who we are, by living our lives to the fullest, we offer alternative narratives in which the dominant position of the youthful, white, middle- to upper-class, heterosexual male is brought into question. We create a space within which change can happen. And we allow ourselves to acknowledge the fact that we all have the right to be treated well, by ourselves and by those around us.

There’s a lot more that could be said on this topic, but I think I’ll just finish things off with another quote from Ragen:

We gotta give them hope.  We gotta give each other hope. There’s a light at the end of this crazy cultural stigma and shame tunnel it’s NOT a train!

Whether you’re talking about being fat or queer, I think these are words to live by.

 

 

* I want to acknowledge that these points aren’t fleshed out to the degree that they should be (for the sake of time and space) and that they don’t cover all the examples of queerness that exist, but I hope that my point is still being made.

No related posts.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  • http://twitter.com/kaminiwa Kaminiwa

    While I suppose technically trans-female genitalia aren’t technically “MALE genitalia”, it’s still entirely possible for a lesbian to quite enjoy cock. Was a bit sad to see it implied otherwise, as it’s a common trans-erasure. (I speak as a lesbian whose partners primarily have penises :) )

  • http://uhpinyuhn.blogspot.com/ David

    It definitely wasn’t my intention to do that, but I can see where you’re coming from by suggesting that it was a result of what I said.

    Thank you for calling me out on that!

  • David

    My reply doesn’t seem to be appearing, so just in case that’s not just my browser being weird:

    It definitely wasn’t my intention to do that, but I can see where
    you’re coming from by suggesting that it was a result of what I said.

    Thank you for calling me out on that!